Race to stamp out animal plague begins
Doença fatal é o flagelo dos agricultores mais pobres do mundo em ruminantes está caminhando a para eliminação.
Killer disease that is scourge of world’s poorest ruminant farmers is ripe for elimination.
A conference hosted by the United Nations in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, from 31 March to 2 April, marked the roll out of a global campaign to eradicate by 2030 the sheep and goat virus, which is known as PPR — an abbreviation of its French name, peste des petits ruminants. PPR eradication is technically feasible, say animal-health specialists, but it is uncertain where the effort’s organization and billions of dollars of necessary funding will come from.
“This is an exercise in persuading the world community and funders that this work could and should be done,” says Jeffrey Mariner, an epidemiologist at Tufts University veterinary school in North Grafton, Massachusetts, who attended the meeting.
PPR is related to measles and rinderpest, which once threatened the livelihoods of cattle herders, especially those in Africa. Causing high fever, diarrhoea and lesions in the mouths of sheep and goats, PPR is highly infectious and kills 30–70% of the animals it infects. It is endemic across northern, central and west Africa and south Asia, and it has more recently taken hold in China and Turkey.
The UN puts the economic costs of PPR at between US$1.5 billion and $2.1 billion per year, a burden borne by some of the world’s poorest people, who rely on sheep and goats for food and income (see ‘Cost of a goat-killer’). “Sheep and goats are the cattle of the poor, and they are the bank for the poor,” says Bernard Vallat, director-general of World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) in Paris, which co-hosted the meeting.
PPR ticks many of the boxes needed for an eradication campaign: an effective vaccine has been available for decades, and scientists have created formulations that remain effective for weeks without refrigeration. Diagnostic tools, including some that can be used in animal pens, are accurate. There also seems to be no wild reservoir from which the virus may rebound once wiped out from domestic flocks and herds. “It’s one of those no-brainers,” says Christopher Oura, a veterinary virologist at the University of the West Indies in St Augustine, Trinidad, who studies PPR. “The tools are out there to eradicate the virus.”
A cost–benefit analysis by Mariner and his colleagues estimated that eradication will save more than $42 billion over a hundred years. The fresh success of the rinderpest eradication campaign also gives many hope that a second animal disease can be eliminated for good. “Before everybody forgets that, people want to get the rest of the world on board,” says Baron.
PPR eradication presents its own challenges. The campaign strategy focuses on dramatically ramping up and coordinating vaccinations, but this is complicated because sheep and goats are more abundant than cattle in most of the developing world, and people hold onto them for a shorter time before selling or slaughtering them. The campaign will also attempt to systematically target areas where the virus is spreading, but veterinary services are weak in many of those regions.
One positive effect of the campaign will be the construction of veterinary infrastructure in these areas. This will have impacts beyond PPR, for example by helping to combat other small ruminant diseases, such as goat and sheep pox. “There should be good knock-on effects for poor people,” says Baron.
How exactly the eradication effort will be coordinated has yet to be hashed out. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization, which co-organized the Abidjan meeting, and the OIE are looking for Western governments, non-governmental organizations and charities to foot much of the estimated cost of $7.6 billion to $9.1 billion.
Samuel Thevasagayam, deputy director for livestock at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in Seattle, Washington, which has contributed funds to PPR vaccine efforts in the past, says that the organization is evaluating whether to support the campaign. “It’s a huge commitment — that’s what causes donors to think carefully,” says Mariner. He hopes that the management structure that emerges will be nimble and open to new ideas and approaches.“With PPR, we’re going to have to continue to innovate,” he says.