Mostrando postagens com marcador Thylacosmilus atrox. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador Thylacosmilus atrox. Mostrar todas as postagens

terça-feira, 5 de março de 2019

Why Are There So Many Marsupials in Australia?


Partner Series
Why Are There So Many Marsupials in Australia?

These marsupials live Down Under (the wallaby, tasmanian devil, wombat, kangaroo with its joey, quokka and koala) but marsupials didn't actually begin their evolution there.
Credit: Shutterstock
Australia is the kingdom of marsupials, home to furry kangaroos, koalas and wombats. The continent has so many marsupials, it raises the question: Did these pouch-bearing mammals arise Down Under?
The answer is an unqualified (or "un-koalafied") no. Marsupials were around for at least 70 million years before they made it to Australia, according to Robin Beck, a lecturer in biology at the University of Salford in the United Kingdom.

"Marsupials absolutely categorically did not originate in Australia," Beck told Live Science. "They are immigrants." [Why Haven't All Primates Evolved into Humans?]

In comparison to most mammals, marsupials are odd. Unlike placental mammals, such as humans, dogs and whales, marsupials give birth to relatively underdeveloped young that continue to grow a ton in the mother's pouch.
"The young are born alive, but they're very poorly developed," Beck told Live Science. "They basically crawl to their mother's nipple, which is often in a pouch, and they basically clamp on the nipple and stay there, feeding on their mother's milk for long periods of time — usually, several months."
And it turns out, the oldest known marsupials are actually from North America, where they evolved during the Cretaceous period after splitting off from placental mammals at least 125 million years ago, Beck said.
These ancient marsupials appeared to flourish in North America, populating what was then the supercontinent Laurasia with about 15 to 20 different marsupial species, all of which are now extinct, Beck said. It's unclear why these marsupials did well. But for some reason, at about the time that the nonavian dinosaurs went extinct, about 66 million years ago, the marsupials made their way down to South America. At that time, North and South America weren't connected as they are today. But the two continents were very close, and a land bridge or a series of islands may have linked them. This connection allowed all kinds of animals to expand their stomping grounds.

Once in South America, marsupials and their close relatives had a field day, diversifying like crazy within 2 million to 3 million years after arriving, Beck said. For instance, marsupials and their close relatives evolved into bear- and weasel-size carnivores, and one even evolved saber teeth. Others evolved to eat fruits and seeds.

"What's happening in South America is they're evolving to fill the kinds of niches that in the northern continents certainly were filled by placental mammals," Beck said.
The marsupial relative <i>Thylacosmilus</i> had saber teeth.

The marsupial relative Thylacosmilus had saber teeth.
Credit: L. Gardner/Copyright AMNH
Many of these marsupials went extinct between then and now, but South America is still a marsupial hotspot today. There are more than 100 species of opossums, seven species of shrew opossums and the adorable monito del monte (Dromiciops gliroides), whose Spanish name translates to "little monkey of the mountain."

On a side note, within the last 1 million years, one of South America's opossums traveled north and now lives in North America. This is the Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), the only marsupial living north of Mexico, Beck said.

Also, opossums belong to a different order than possums. Possums are native to Australia and New Guinea, are closely related to kangaroos, and have a number of anatomical differences, such as enlarged lower incisors, that the South American opossum lacks, Beck said.
So, how did marsupials get from South America to Australia? [Will There Ever Be Another Pangea?]
Up until about 40 million to 35 million years ago, both South America and Australia were connected to Antarctica, forming one giant land mass. At that time, Antarctica wasn't covered with ice, but instead with a temperate rainforest, and "it was not a bad place to live," Beck said.
It appears that marsupials and their relatives bounded down from South America, strode across Antarctica and wound up in Australia, Beck said. There's even fossil evidence: On Antarctica's Seymour Island, there are fossils of marsupials and their relatives, including a close relative of the monito del monte, Beck said.

The oldest fossil marsupials from Australia are found at a 55-million-year-old site called Tingamarra, near the town of Murgon in Queensland, Beck said. Some of the fossil marsupials at Tingamarra are similar to those in South America. For instance, the ancient and tiny fruit-eating marsupial Chulpasia from Peru is a close relative of another fossil marsupial found at Tingamarra, Beck said.
Yet another Tingamarra marsupial, the insect-eating Djarthia, may be the ancestor of all living Australian marsupials, Beck said.

Then, there's a big gap in the Australian fossil record. After Tingamarra, the next oldest marsupial fossils on record are 25 million years old. "What we see then is clearly there's been a huge amount of diversification within Australia," Beck said. "By that time we see koalas, we see relatives of wombats, we see relatives of bandicoots." Basically, all of the major Australian marsupial groups are present by 25 million years ago, he said.

Again, it's unclear why marsupials thrived in Australia. But one idea is that when times were tough, marsupial mothers could jettison any developing babies they had in their pouches, while mammals had to wait until gestation was over, spending precious resources on their young, Beck said.
Another idea is that there were no placental mammals competing with the marsupials in Australia. But this idea is now contradicted, by a fossil tooth that belongs to a placental mammal or a placental-mammal relative discovered at Tingamarra. This indicates that placental mammals were on the continent as far back as 55 million years ago, Beck said.

Today, there are about 250 marsupial species alive in Australia, around 120 marsupial species in South America and just one (the Virginia opossum) living in North America. In essence, the marsupials' ancestral geography has flipped.
"That pattern is the complete reverse of the situation 125 million years ago," Beck said. "Where things are today is not necessarily an indication of where they were millions of years ago."

segunda-feira, 22 de julho de 2013

Tamanho não é documento

Espécie pré-histórica de dente-de-sabre foi um superpredador, mas sua mordida era tão fraca quanto a de um gato 

RODRIGO DE OLIVEIRA ANDRADE | Edição Online 14:30 12 de julho de 2013
© CLAIRE HOUCK/WIKICOMMONS
blalbalb
Crânio do Thylacosmilus atrox: seu enorme dente canino era maior que o de qualquer outra espécie dente-de-sabre

Um grupo de pesquisadores da Austrália e dos Estados Unidos deu um passo importante na compreensão do comportamento de caça do Thylacosmilus atrox, espécie pré-histórica de dente-de-sabre que habitou a América Latina, sobretudo a região da Argentina, há 3,5 milhões de anos. Com base em modelos computacionais tridimensionais, eles examinaram o desempenho biomecânico do animal ao atacar suas presas. Esses modelos foram digitalizados e, em seguida, submetidos a um software que simulou a força de sua mordida.

Os resultados foram comparados com os do Smilodon fatalis, o famoso e emblemático tigre-dente-de-sabre, extinto há 10 mil anos, e do leopardo que conhecemos hoje. Concluíram que a musculatura da mandíbula das duas espécies com dentes-de-sabre eram fracas quando comparadas à do leopardo, mas a do T. atrox surpreendeu. Apesar do tamanho – em torno de 1,5 metro e 100 quilogramas (kg) – e dos enormes dentes caninos superiores, sua mordida era tão ou mais fraca que a de um gato doméstico.
De acordo com o artigo, publicado na edição de junho da revista PloS One, isso era compensado, porém, pelos músculos de seu pescoço, responsáveis justamente pela movimentação de seus dentes gigantescos. “Os músculos da mandíbula do T. atrox eram constrangedores”, afirma Stephen Wroe, pesquisador da University of New South Wales, na Austrália, e autor principal do estudo. “Mas seu desempenho biomecânico durante as simulações sugere que ele, assim como o Smilodon fatalis, era bem adaptado às forças geradas pelos músculos de seu pescoço”.

Ele explica que seus enormes dentes, cujas raízes podiam se estender até a caixa craniana, eram frágeis. Por isso, o animal precisava abater suas presas rapidamente, de modo a não comprometer os caninos. Assim, o T. atrox tinha de imobilizá-las usando os antebraços. Em seguida, numa mistura de força e precisão, valia-se de sua poderosa musculatura e inseria os dentes na traqueia da vítima, atingindo suas artérias. “Presas de grande porte são perigosas, mesmo para superpredadores. Por isso, quanto mais depressa elas são abatidas, menores serão as chances de o predador se machucar ou de atrair a atenção de outros concorrentes”, disse o pesquisador.

Apesar da semelhança, o T. atrox não tem parentesco evolutivo com o Smilodon fatalis, o representante máximo dos mamíferos superpredadores. Na verdade, explica Wroe, o Smilodon é resultado de um de pelo menos cinco “experimentos” independentes registrados na história evolutiva dos dentes-de-sabre no decorrer da Era dos Mamíferos, que se estende por cerca de 65 milhões de anos.
“Essas duas espécies estão separadas por pelo menos 125 milhões de anos de evolução”, afirma Wroe. Trata-se de um caso clássico de convergência evolutiva, fenômeno em que duas ou mais espécies, independentemente, desenvolvem características semelhantes. “Sabe-se hoje que, do ponto de vista evolutivo, os T. atrox tem os marsupiais como parentes mais próximos”, explica.

Artigo científico

WROE, S., et al. Comparative Biomechanical Modeling of Metatherian and Placental Saber-Tooths: A Different Kind of Bite for an Extreme Pouched Predator. PloS One. v.8. jun. 2013.