Data Suggests Legs and Toes in Ancestor of Living Snakes
From
the robust boa constrictor to the venomous rattlesnake, all of the more
than 3,400 snake species that slither today may have descended from the
same prehistoric forest prowler, whose sinuous body had two small hind
legs with toes and ankles, researchers reported on Tuesday.
After
analyzing data gathered through fossils, genetic sequencing and
anatomical comparisons of 73 snake and lizard species, a team of
paleontologists from Yale University has constructed what it calls the
most comprehensive snake “family tree” to date. The findings provide an
answer to longstanding questions about when, where and how modern snakes
originated.
“Having
that tree as a backbone let us draw a ton of conclusions for what the
ancestral snake would have been like,” said Daniel J. Field, a doctoral
candidate in evolutionary biology and an author of the study. The team
concluded that the most recent common ancestor of all living snakes was
nocturnal, thrived 128.5 million years ago in the Southern Hemisphere
and devoured relatively large prey whole using its sharp, hooked teeth
as a hunting tool.
To
reach this conclusion, the team’s first step was to reconstruct the
snake’s family tree from tips to its trunk. To better understand when
certain characteristics — like the ability to constrict prey or hunt at
night — first appeared, the researchers used the genetic and
morphological data they collected to piece together how different groups
of living snakes are related to one another.
After
mapping the relationships among distinct snake groups, the
herpetologists used a series of algorithms to fill in when each trait
first arose, in a process called ancestral state reconstruction. Mr.
Field and his team identified 11 characteristics that they wanted to
place onto the snake’s tree of life. Each trait would answer a question
about snake evolution that scientists often debate: Did ancient snakes
dwell in the water or on land? Originate from the Northern or the
Southern Hemisphere? Ambush their prey or forage for food?
Using
the tree, team members could rule out the traits that could not have
belonged to the most recent ancestor of living snakes and generate a
model of what traits it did exhibit. They found that it did not
constrict prey like boas and pythons, but did have remnants of hind
legs, which Mr. Field said were most likely vestigial structures that
served no purpose in locomotion.
“I
was most amazed by how strongly we inferred that the common ancestor
retained hind limbs,” he said. The team published its tree of life for
snakes in the journal BMC Evolutionary Biology.
The
team’s ancestral reconstruction is not without its limitations, Mr.
Field said. Because there are no fossil records of the most recent
common ancestor of living snakes, Mr. Field and his team have no way of
confirming that the creature they recreated with their models is
correct.
“Sometimes
evolution plays out in unexpected and strange ways,” he said. “We think
we’ve got a strongly supported idea, and based on the mathematical
reconstruction it is what is most likely to be true.”
Christopher J. Raxworthy,
a herpetologist at the American Museum of Natural History in New York,
who was not involved in the study, called the work fantastic and said he
was impressed by how strongly the genetic and fossil data supported the
authors’ findings. But he said he was not surprised that the common
ancestor of all living snakes had hind legs, because several living
snakes have vestigial hind limbs and pelvic girdles.
Dr.
Raxworthy added a caveat to the work. He said that herpetology, like
most of evolutionary biology, is on the cusp of a genomic revolution,
and that many snake groups most likely will have their entire genomes
sequenced in coming years. Because of that influx of genetic
information, “it’s almost inevitable that there will be changes to this
evolutionary history of snakes,” he said.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Observação: somente um membro deste blog pode postar um comentário.