It is not rare to find in the fossil record of vertebrates cases in which fossils
from one or few extinct species predominate over others represented in a
bone assemblage. This type of findings has happened in deposits of
several geological ages and environmental contexts.
A very common interpretation for such deposits is that a single event of mortality
occurred (i.e. catastrophic mortality). In this case, what we have is a
“family portrait,” because what we find is similar to what the
population was at a given moment in the past and reflects the abundance
of individuals in different age groups at a given time.
Another
possible explanation for this sharp, uneven representation of species in
a bone assemblage, most often not considered, is that multiple death
events occurred to a single or few individuals of a species (i.e.
attritional mortality). In this case, we have a “photo album,” because
what we find is individuals who did not coexist in time and represent
samples of different generations of the population.
Depending on
the interpretation one assumes for the bone assemblage formation,
different paleoecological conclusions can be drawn from the same bone assemblage.
Since the prevailing view is of catastrophic mortality for such
assemblages, the most common interpretation for the existence of a
predominant extinct species is that it was gregarious. However, if one
considers that attritional mortality was the major process, nothing can
be concluded about the behavior of a predominant species.
In our paper “The dominance of an extant gregarious taxon in an attritional accumulation: Taphonomy and palaeoecological implications,” published in the journal Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,
we added information to challenge the common notion that assemblages
dominated by one or few extinct species means that these species were
gregarious. We studied a not completely buried bone assemblage formed in
the 65m deep pitfall cave Sumidouro do Sansão. This cave is located in
the Serra da Capivara region, northeast Brazil, which is one of the
richest archaeological and paleontological areas in the country. Bottom of the cave. Image courtesy FUMDHAM ArchivesWe analyzed more than 900 bone/teeth pieces from this assemblage housed in the collection of Fundação Museu do Homem Americano (FUMDHAM), Piauí State, Brazil. By far, the most abundant species of the assemblage was Kerodon rupestris, an
endemic-extant rodent from Brazil. This rodent is gregarious, and a
habitat specialist that inhabits rocky outcrops. From a total of 38
individuals securely identified, 35 belong to Kerodon rupestris.
A male individual of K. rupestris. Image courtesy Elver MayerThe emplacement of Kerodon rupestris remains
was probably due to the pitfall entrapment of individuals. Besides the
morphology of the cave that is suggestive of such process, our
interpretation is supported by the fact that we found remains
representing skulls and many bones from different parts of the skeleton,
and that the skeletons are relatively complete and do not present
extensive fragmentation.
Based on the known gregarious behavior of the
species and its adaptations for climbing, a very logical conclusion for
our findings is of catastrophic mortality (e.g. lightning stroke the
colony, since the cave is in an elevated position, killing several
individuals at once). However, fortunately, we were able to obtain
radiocarbon dating from four individuals of Kerodon rupestris. Our
chronology reveals that ages range approximately from 8kyr BP to 4kyr
BP. Thus, the bone assemblage was formed by the addition of individuals
in multiple events, characterizing an attritional accumulation. Skull of K. rupestris. Image courtesy Elver MayerOur
finding was surprising because since these rodents inhabit rocky
outcrops and are known for their climbing skills — we would not expect
them to get trapped in a cave. However, the cave pitfall has steep walls
and is deep, which may explain the imprisoning of those animals. In
addition, this environment is part of their habitat, representing a
regular risk of injuries and entrapment. Lastly, given the chronological
range of the assemblage, a death every 115 years would be enough to
account for the number of individuals found.
After death, each
skeleton remained exposed on the bottom of the pit during an uncertain
period of time until the recovery. This period was marked by the
occurrence of post-depositional damage on the skeletons. They were
disarticulated, their bones were fragmented and a few developed
features due to weathering. Also, some bones were covered by
incrustation and others perforated by invertebrates, probably for
pupation purposes. Scheme of assemblage formation. Figure courtesy Elver MayerOur study shows that even a species that is known to live in groups, such as Kerodon rupestris,
can dominate bone assemblages formed by the subsequent death of
individuals from different generations of the population. The main
paleoecological implication of our finding is that the association of
many individuals from the same species in a bone assemblage does not
necessarily mean a single event of mortality, and it is not reliable to
infer gregariousness for extinct species based solely on the
disproportional abundance of one or few species.
Thus, understanding
the genesis of a fossil assemblage is mandatory to interpret the
paleoecological information preserved in the fossil record.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Observação: somente um membro deste blog pode postar um comentário.