Por mais de 70 anos, os cientistas têm intrigado as formas desconcertantes de fósseis de meio bilhão de anos que não se parecem com nenhum outro organismo que já viveu na Terra. Os paleontólogos não foram capazes de dizer se muitos desses fósseis de forma estranha de oceanos antigos representam plantas, animais ou alguma outra forma de vida. Agora, vestígios de colesterol - uma assinatura da vida animal - de um conjunto de fósseis incrivelmente bem preservados confirmam que uma criatura chamada Dickinsonia, que se parece um pouco com um tapete de banho acolchoado, era na verdade um animal estranho.
These chemical traces “are giving us a completely different way of
understanding what is happening” in very ancient ecosystems, says
paleontologist Douglas Erwin of the Smithsonian Institution’s National
Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C.
As formas de vida que viveram na Terra há meio bilhão de anos deixaram para trás alguns dos mais estranhos fósseis conhecidos. Chamados de Ediacarans - batizados com o nome de Ediacara Hills da Austrália, onde alguns dos primeiros foram encontrados - eles viveram nos oceanos entre 570 milhões e 541 milhões de anos atrás, pouco antes da explosão cambriana, quando surgiram os primeiros animais reconhecíveis. Até quase um metro de comprimento, algumas das 200 espécies descritas de Ediacaran têm frondes em forma de fractal. Outros, como Dickinsonia, parecem ter módulos cheios de fluido que lhes davam uma aparência “acolchoada”. Teorias sobre o que eles eram abundantes: protistas gigantes? Liquens? Algas? Algum tipo de esponja? Ou alguma outra forma de vida que desapareceu desde então?
There are some clues. Evidence suggests some Ediacara moved, and studies of the way they seemed to grow have suggested at least some of the creatures were animals, including Dickinsonia. Others were probably colonies of bacteria or algae.
Ilya Bobrovskiy, a geologist who now works at the Australian National
University (ANU) in Canberra, wondered whether he might be able to get
clues from some exceptional fossils that still preserve a film of what
looks like organic material. These fossils come from a cliff on the
shore of the White Sea in northwestern Russia, where for 550 million
years, the rocks have escaped the heat and pressure that can obliterate
molecular traces. “They are some of the least cooked rocks of this age
that anyone has found,” Erwin says.
Bobrovskiy contacted Jochen Brocks, an expert in ancient
biomolecules at ANU, to ask whether he thought the film might still
contain molecules that could reveal clues to the organism. “Jochen said I
was completely insane,” Bobrovskiy says. (Brocks’s version of the
story: “I said, ‘Right. That’s the most stupid idea I’ve ever heard.’
But I told him he should find out for himself.”)
Bobrovskiy moved from Russia to Australia to join Brocks’s lab.
There, he first tested his idea on a collection of small round Ediacaran
fossils called Beltanelliformis. The researchers removed the
film from the rock, dissolved it, and used gas chromatography and mass
spectrometry to look for preserved organic molecules. They found high
levels of hopanes, a molecule that suggested the Beltanelliformis were colonies of cyanobacteria, the researchers reported earlier this year.
Buoyed by that result, the researchers had the nerve to try the technique with the much larger Dickinsonia fossils.
(“They would have brought $30,000 on eBay,” Brocks says. “But we sliced
them up and dissolved them.”) The results, reported today in Science, were striking. In the Dickinsonia fossil, 93% of the organic molecules had 27 carbon molecules;
that makes them members of a family called cholesteroids, which
includes cholesterol and is a signature of animal cells. Samples from
immediately above and below the Dickinsonia fossil had a
different mix of steroids: Only 11% were cholesteroids and more than 70%
were stigmasteroids, molecules with 29 carbon atoms, which are a
signature of green algae.
“It’s a very unusual style of organic preservation,” says Gordon
Love, a geochemist at the University of California (UC), Riverside. “We
don’t usually expect to find these organic films, so there are a few
quirky features that require more evaluation.” Still, he says, the
conclusion that Dickinsonia produced cholesterol—and was
therefore an animal—“is the most parsimonious explanation at this stage.
I would say it’s plausible.”
“If this were the only evidence we had, it wouldn’t be enough,” says
Mary Droser, a paleontologist and expert on Ediacarans at UC Riverside.
“But along with the other evidence, it’s great.” She says it’s
especially satisfying that the biochemical evidence came from Dickinsonia. “I won’t say it’s the [Tyrannosaurus] rex of
the Ediacarans—it’s not a predator. But it has that sort of standing,”
she says, as an iconic representative of its ecosystem. “It is a special
one, and it’s wonderful to have evidence from the geochemical world
that it was an animal.”
doi:10.1126/science.aav4877
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Observação: somente um membro deste blog pode postar um comentário.