Strongest evidence of early humans butchering animals discovered in North Africa
Em um alto planalto gramado na Argélia, a apenas 100 quilômetros do Mar Mediterrâneo, os primeiros ancestrais humanos mataram cavalos extintos, antílopes e outros animais com ferramentas de pedra primitivas de 2 milhões a 2,4 milhões de anos atrás. As datas, relatadas hoje, afastam a idade das ferramentas mais antigas no norte da África em até meio milhão de anos e fornecem uma nova visão sobre como esses proto-humanos se espalham pelo continente.
For decades, east Africa has been considered the birthplace of our genus Homo, and the epicenter of early toolmaking for almost 1 million years. The oldest known Homo fossils date back 2.8 million years in Ethiopia. Nearby, just 200,000 years later, scientists have found simple tools,
such as thumb-size stone flakes, and fist-size cores from which such
flakes were struck, in the nearby Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Claims of
even older tools and animal bones with cutmarks stretch back 3.4 million
years in east Africa, but those claims are controversial.
Regardless, the long-standing view has been that once hominins, or
members of the human family, invented stone tools in east Africa, they
didn’t travel far with them until 1.8 million years ago (or, more controversially, 2 million years ago, in China) when tools turn up in Algeria, Georgia, and China.
The new study upends this view. After 25 years of excavations at the
Ain Hanech complex—a dry ravine in Algeria—an international team reports
the discovery of about 250 primitive tools and 296 bones of animals
from a site called Ain Boucherit. About two dozen animal bones have cut
marks that show they were skinned, defleshed, or pounded for marrow.
Made of limestone and flint, the sharp-edged flakes and round cores—some
the size of tennis balls—resemble those found in east Africa. Both
represent the earliest known toolkit, the so-called Oldowan technology,
named for the site where they were found 80 years ago at Olduvai in
Tanzania.
Ain Hanech lacks volcanic minerals, which provide the gold
standard for dating sites in eastern Africa. Instead, the researchers
used three other dating methods, notably paleomagnetic dating, which
detects known reversals in Earth’s magnetic field that are recorded in
rock. The tools and cut-marked bones date as far back as 2.4 million years ago, the researchers report today in Science. They also used the identity of large, extinct animals, such as mastodons and ancient horses, to confirm the dates.
Os ossos com marcas de corte representam "a evidência substantiva mais antiga para o açougue" em qualquer lugar, diz o paleoantropólogo Thomas Plummer, do Queens College da Universidade de Nova York, que não esteve envolvido no estudo. Embora outros locais dessa idade na África Oriental tenham ferramentas de pedra, a evidência para o efetivo açougue de animais não é tão forte, diz ele.
At Ain Hanech, the dates provide “convincing evidence for stone tools
and cut-marked bones at about 2 million years or more,” says
geochronologist Warren Sharp of the Berkeley Geochronology Center in
California. But he finds the 2.4 million date “less compelling,” because
of potential issues with the dating methods.
Whether the tools are 2 million or 2.4 million years old, they
suggest toolmakers had spread farther and wider across Africa earlier
than previously known. “There must have been a corridor through the
Sahara with movement between east Africa and North Africa,” says
paleoanthropologist Rick Potts of the Smithsonian Institution’s National
Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C. Alternatively, the new
dates suggest hominins in at least two different parts of Africa,
separated by 5000 kilometers, were sophisticated enough to independently
invent rudimentary stone tools and habitually make them, Potts says.
Either way, the study suggests that by 2 million years ago or so,
making stone tools and butchering meat with them was routine for human
ancestors in distant corners of the African continent. And this
technological revolution may have given them the tools they needed to
travel farther and wider across Africa and beyond.
doi:10.1126/science.aaw2245
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Observação: somente um membro deste blog pode postar um comentário.