The Origin of Filter Feeding in Whales
PlumX Metrics
Highlights
- •A new species of 30 million year old whale has been found near Charleston, South Carolina
- •This new species is a relative of modern baleen-bearing whales but retains teeth
- •Its molars are large, multi-cusped, and overlapping and were used for filter feeding
- •Filter feeding evolved before baleen; early whales had teeth and baleen
Summary
As
the largest known vertebrates of all time, mysticetes depend on
keratinous sieves called baleen to capture enough small prey to sustain
their enormous size [
].
The origins of baleen are controversial: one hypothesis suggests that
teeth were lost during a suction-feeding stage of mysticete evolution
and that baleen evolved thereafter [
,
,
], whereas another suggests that baleen evolved before teeth were lost [
]. Here we report a new species of toothed mysticete, Coronodon havensteini,
from the Oligocene of South Carolina that is transitional between
raptorial archaeocete whales and modern mysticetes. Although the
morphology and wear on its anterior teeth indicate that it captured
large prey, its broad, imbricated, multi-cusped lower molars frame
narrow slots that were likely used for filter feeding. Coronodon havensteini
is a basal, if not the most basal, mysticete, and our analysis suggests
that it is representative of an initial stage of mysticete evolution in
which teeth were functional analogs to baleen. In later lineages, the
diastema between teeth increased—in some cases, markedly so [
]—and
may mark a stage at which the balance of the oral fissure shifted from
mostly teeth to mostly baleen. When placed in a phylogenetic context,
our new taxon indicates that filter feeding was preceded by raptorial
feeding and that suction feeding evolved separately within a clade
removed from modern baleen whales.
Keywords
Results
Systematics
Order Cetacea; Suborder Mysticeti; Coronodon havensteini gen. et sp. nov.
Holotype
CCNHM 108. Nearly complete, 1.0-m-long skull, mandibles, 14 vertebrae, and partial ribs (Figures 1, 2, and 3; Figures S1–S3; Tables S1 and S2).
Etymology
Coronodon havensteini.
Genus is Greek for “crown tooth,” referring to the multi-cusped molars.
The species name recognizes Mark Havenstein, who discovered the
holotype.
Locality and Age
Wando River near Highway 41 Bridge, South Carolina, Berkeley County. Ashley Formation, Oligocene, uppermost Rupelian [
]. Additional locality information available upon request.
Diagnosis
Coronodon
has the following mysticete synapomorphies: supraoccipital level with
temporal fossa (character 25: state 1), broad basioccipital crests (39:
2), all cusps of posterior teeth subequal (99: 1), upturned antorbital
process of maxilla (100: 1), and splayed basal cusps on posterior teeth
(206: 1) (Figures 1, 2, S1, and S2; Data S1). Like some archaeocetes [
], its rostrum is twisted counterclockwise in anterior view (Figure 3). Coronodon havensteini is unique in having anterior lower molars labially overlapping posterior lower molars (Figure 2).
Feeding Behavior
Toothed
mysticetes evolved from archaeocetes, a paraphyletic group ancestral to
all extant cetaceans. Archaeocetes are interpreted as raptorial
feeders: they hunted and caught prey with their teeth, one at a time.
This inference is supported by fossilized stomach contents [
] and bite marks on small archaeocetes [
]. Raptorial feeding is also indicated in Coronodon by the caniniform incisors and the truncated and worn crown of the right P2 (Figure S1). Similar wear has been interpreted as being created by abrasion during feeding by the skeletons or other hard parts of prey [
,
,
].
By contrast, other features suggest that Coronodon
was less effective at raptorial feeding than archaeocetes. The latter
resemble raptorial odontocetes in having a long, narrow rostrum, which
likely allowed prey to be caught with only a turn of the head and
minimal drag [
]. The rostrum of Coronodon is wider, as indicated by the straight sides and shorter mandibular symphysis (Figures 1 and 2). In archaeocetes, the symphysis extends to p3, whereas the symphysis of Coronodon
terminates anterior to the canine. Importantly, a wider rostrum in
extant mysticetes is associated with a larger oral cavity, which is a
critical adaptation for filter feeding [
]. Extant mysticetes also adjust the size of their oral cavity when feeding [
,
], and some have suggested that loose rostral sutures may facilitate this [
,
]. Somewhat surprisingly, Coronodon has simple and open rostral sutures too, unlike the sutures of many other toothed mysticetes [
].
The premolars and molars of Coronodon differ from those of Basilosauridae (Figures 2A
and 2G), the closest relatives of mysticetes among archaeocetes. The
sides of the p4 in the latter are steeper: lines connecting the apices
of three central cusps form an angle of 82° or 98° in Cynthiacetus (MNHN.F.PRU 102) and Dorudon (UM 10122), respectively, as compared to 155° in Coronodon.
A smaller angle is more effective at puncturing prey because it
concentrates and sustains the bite force on the central cusp. Even
greater differences are seen in the molars. In Coronodon, the
first two molars are subequal to the p4 and resemble it in having mesial
and distal accessory cusps. By contrast, the molars of basilosaurids
are much smaller (e.g., p4/m1 = 1.59 for Dorudon), and the lower molars lack mesial cusps [
].
Large molars are often indicative of greater mastication, but the
pattern of wear makes this interpretation unlikely. Each lower molar has
a labial wear facet that extends apically onto the base of the crown
but remains far removed from the carinae (Figure 2C). As a result, the scissor-like shearing between upper and lower molars, as seen in protocetids like Georgiacetus,
is absent. Although the posterior molars could have been used to impale
prey, this behavior seems uncommon given the small size of most apical
wear facets (1.6–4 mm; Figures 2B and 2E) and the fact that the molars had reduced support from alveolar bone (Figure 2A).
For each double-rooted tooth, only the distal half of each root is
surrounded by alveolar bone, suggesting that the high occlusal pressures
associated with macrophagy were rarely encountered.
Early studies speculated that toothed mysticetes used their teeth to filter feed [
,
],
an idea later described as the “dental filtration hypothesis.” However,
the teeth of previously described toothed mysticetes are too few, too
small, too simplified, or too worn to be effective in filtering [
].
This led to a spate of recent studies that have developed a new
hypothesis: that filter-feeding mysticetes evolved from edentulous,
suction-feeding whales that lacked baleen [
,
,
]. The molars of Coronodon
are far larger than those of other toothed mysticetes and hearken back
to the dental filtration hypothesis. Unlike archaeocetes and most
neocetes, its upper teeth widely overlap its lower teeth instead of
interdigitating with them. As a result, when the mouth is opened, the
posterior teeth enclose diamond-shaped gaps (∼15 × 35 mm at m1 and m2)
that could filter out prey of varying size. When the mouth is closed,
the gaps in Coronodon would have been closed off by the crown
of the opposing dentition. Even so, narrow slots (0.5–3 mm wide) between
the imbricated lower molars remained open (Figure 2B),
allowing even smaller prey to be filtered. The serrate borders of these
slots are formed by small accessory cusps that point distally from the
tooth preceding the slot and mesially from the tooth following the slot.
In archaeocetes, the basal cusps are directed more apically, instead of
mesially or distally (Figure 2G). Many of the basal cusps in Coronodon have minor, but distinct, apical wear, indicating that they were exposed and not covered in gingiva (Table S2).
The wear on the fairly sheltered, mesially directed cusps is unexpected
and may have been formed by prey that accumulated along the slots
during filtering. Such passive wear is quite common in marine mammals,
with substrate being the best-documented culprit, particularly in
porpoises [
]. Modern beaked whales use suction feeding to capture prey [
],
which impact their tusks upon entering the oral fissure. This can
result in strong wear on the mesial side of the tooth, specifically that
portion exposed during typical gape employed during feeding (Figure 2H).
Interestingly, the wear of baleen in extant mysticetes seems driven by
the intraoral flow of water and the prey and sediment carried with it [
]. Apical wear also occurs in some aetiocetids [
,
], but we have come to a different interpretation because, in Coronodon,
that wear also occurs on cusps sheltered by the preceding tooth. One
unnamed aetiocetid (NMV P252567) has mesodistal grooves and large
patches of wear on the lingual sides of its crowns [
]. We agree with the interpretation that this wear reflects suction feeding from the benthos [
], as it mirrors the only extant mammal, Odobenus, that does this as a primary feeding mode [
]. Importantly, no comparable wear or grooves exist in the only known specimen of Coronodon.
The
presence of interdental, filter-feeding slots, as we propose, is
consistent with the pattern of dental erosion on the crowns of the
posterior lower teeth. The p3-m2 (right) and p3-m1 (left) teeth have
ovoid pockets of dental erosion that emanate from the deep notches
between the apical-most three cusps (Figures 2C–2E), similar to caries that form in the carnassial notch of dogs [
].
The remaining three to four notches between accessory cusps lack dental
erosion, even though they are much further from the apex of the tooth.
This pattern is expected if, as we suggest, the filter-feeding slots
flushed this area with seawater, small prey, and/or other particulate
matter that could inhibit plaque formation or abrade it off the tooth.
The closest extant analog for the feeding behavior we reconstruct for Coronodon is the leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx), which uses its anterior teeth to secure prey and its postcanine dentition to filter out smaller prey, mostly krill [
]. The crabeater seal (Lobodon carcinophagus) also uses its posterior dentition for filter feeding [
], and these two pinnipeds are distinguished from other phocids in having a longer rostrum [
,
,
], larger teeth, small diastema, and subequal molars and premolars [
]. These traits characterize Coronodon as well, but filter-feeding seals primarily use gaps between cusps of the same tooth to filter out crustaceans [
], whereas we interpret that Coronodon utilized gaps between teeth.
Evolution of Baleen and Filter Feeding
There is little evidence for baleen in Coronodon.
The only osteological correlates for baleen are laterally positioned
palatal foramina, which, in the gray whale and presumably all other
extant mysticetes, convey branches of the superior alveolar artery to
supply the baleen-bearing, oral epithelium [
,
]. In Coronodon,
there are only three to four minute, palatal foramina, most of which
are clustered around the P3. This contrasts with the six widely
distributed foramina and sulci in Aetiocetus weltoni, which indicates the presence of baleen in this taxon [
]. Although Coronodon
probably lacked baleen, its morphology is suggestive of the following
hypothesis. The first mysticetes, and their descendants like Coronodon,
filter fed by funneling water through interdental slots whose dorsal
margins were rimmed by thickened gingiva. If proto-baleen evolved from
the gingiva at the lateral ends of these slots, then proto-baleen would
not have been disturbed by the lower dentition (contra [
])
and selection could have favored smaller teeth and larger,
baleen-filled diastema. In fact, there is evidence of thick gingiva in Coronodon. Broad zones of dental erosion, which typically form in gingival pockets, occur on the labial side of P4 and M2 (Figures 1D and 1F) and suggest a maximal gingival thickness of 5 cm (distance from alveolus to apical edge of erosion).
We
tested this scenario by tracing the evolution of tooth size,
morphology, and spacing on the most parsimonious tree for a modified
mysticete supermatrix [
] (Figures 4 and S4; Table S3). Coronodon and the unnamed taxon ChM PV5720 from the Charleston area are the most basal mysticetes, followed by Metasqualodon symmetricus from Japan. This topology broadly supports our hypothesis that Coronodon
is representative of a pre-baleen dental stage of filter feeding.
Molars having mesially oriented, basal denticles, which encroach into
the interdental slots, are optimized as evolving at the base of
Mysticeti and then persisting until molars are lost in mysticetes (Figure 4).
Apical orientation of basal cusps in the clade including aetiocetids
and mammalodontids is interpreted as a reversal of the archaeocete
condition. The evolution of molar diastema is complicated, but the base
of Mysticeti is characterized by two or more successive widenings of
diastema that culminate in the exceptionally broad diastema of Llanocetus denticrenatus, followed by the loss of posterior teeth in eomysticetids (Figure 4) [
]. Like a previous study [
], we view the palatal foramina in A. weltoni as indicative of baleen. Thus, under our topology, either mammalodontids lost baleen [
] or else baleen persisted in this family despite the absence of its osteological correlate.
Discussion
In contrast to other studies [
,
,
,
],
we infer that filter feeding evolved shortly after odontocetes and
mysticetes diverged. Across extant vertebrates, filter feeding is
associated with a large body size [
];
thus, one way to test our hypothesis is to reconstruct body size
evolution in mysticetes. There has been substantial work in this area [
,
,
,
,
],
but several questions remain. A recent study inferred that the most
recent common ancestor of all extant cetaceans was 167 kg [
], whereas another suggested that this taxon was about 2.5 m in length [
]. Using equations that relate body mass to length [
], a cetacean this long should be about 175 kg. Coronodon is much larger: an equation that estimates body length from width across the zygomatic process results in a length of 4.9 m [
]. This length corresponds to a mass of 1,150 kg, very similar to the mass estimated for the archaeocete Dorudon atrox [
]. Determining whether Coronodon
simply retained the body size of archaeocetes or represents a dramatic
increase over a small ancestral neocete will be difficult. Llanocetus was undoubtedly very large, whereas Metasqualodon was much smaller; however, the skull of neither taxon is well known or fully described.
Although
our findings support the dental filtration hypothesis, are they also at
odds with the suction-feeding hypothesis? The two are not mutually
exclusive, because filter feeding can coexist with suction feeding, as
demonstrated by leopard and crabeater seals [
].
Among extant odontocetes, the mandibular bluntness index, or MBI (i.e.,
ratio of the posterior width to the oblique length of the mandible) [
], is significantly correlated with suction feeding [
,
]. The MBI for Coronodon
is 0.41, in line with extant raptorial feeders; however, there are
exceptions. Many odontocetes with long, narrow rostra occasionally
suction feed, and others, like ziphiids, rely almost exclusively on this
behavior [
,
].
In fact, the only study to test associations of suction-feeding traits
in a phylogenetic context inferred that basal neocetes used a
combination of teeth and suction for capturing and ingesting prey [
]. Given the importance of suction feeding in discussions on the origin of baleen [
,
,
,
,
],
it is critical to develop more methods to distinguish degrees of
suction feeding in fossil taxa. Otherwise, the suction-feeding
hypothesis for the origin of baleen will remain a speculative scenario,
instead of a hypothesis corroborated by testing.
In reconstructing the behavior of Coronodon,
we take a more conservative view by suggesting that it primarily
employed ram feeding, whereby an aquatic predator opens its mouth and
then thrusts its body onto prey. Ram feeding is one of the simplest
forms of aquatic predation [
] and is commonly used among odontocetes, and specialized forms are used by all but one species of extant mysticetes [
].
If our interpretation is correct, then suction feeding in aetiocetids
and mammalodontids is not representative of an early stage through which
the ancestor of all extant mysticetes passed, but instead evolved after
their ancestor diverged from other mysticetes. Ram feeding is
associated with positive allometry of the skull, mandibles, and buccal
cavity in rorquals, and similar allometric relationships apply to other
extant mysticetes as well [
,
,
,
,
].
These differences are likely the result of positive feedback in filter
feeders: larger mouths can capture more prey, and more prey can sustain a
larger body size. Thus, we predict that future studies on skeletal
proportions of the most basal mysticetes will find that they had
proportionally larger mandibles and rostra than archaeocetes. This
prediction, as well as others we have made involving body size, tooth
size, and dental morphology, provide clear direction for further testing
of the dental filtration hypothesis. In the meantime, we encourage
those with differing views on the origin of baleen to do the same.
STAR★Methods
Key Resources Table
REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
---|---|---|
Deposited Data | ||
Morphological partition of dataset for phylogenetic analysis | This paper; http://morphobank.org | P2442 |
Molecular partition of dataset for phylogenetic analysis | [ ] | N/A |
Supermatrix of morphological and molecular data used for phylogenetic analysis | This paper; http://morphobank.org | P2442 |
Trees found from all phylogenetic analyses | This paper; http://morphobank.org | P2442 |
Diastema size as discrete character with tree | This paper; http://morphobank.org | P2442 |
Diastema size as continuous character with tree | This paper; http://morphobank.org | P2442 |
Software and Algorithms | ||
TNT, tree analysis using new technology | [ ] http://www.lillo.org.ar/phylogeny/ | N/A |
Mesquite 3.2 | [41] http://mesquiteproject.org | N/A |
Amira 5.4.3 | N/A |
Contact for Reagent and Resource Sharing
Further
information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed
to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Jonathan Geisler (jgeisler@nyit.edu).
Method Details
Internal Anatomy
The internal cranial morphology of Coronodon
was studied with CT scans and 3D visualizations of that data. CT scans
were acquired using a Siemens SOMATOM sensation 64 at the Medical
University of South Carolina, with voxels 0.9765 × 0.9765 × 0.6 mm in
size. The rostrum, mandibles, and braincase were scanned separately and
then articulated in virtual space using the program Amira 5.4.3.
Phylogenetic Analyses
We based our phylogenetic analysis on a modified version of a published supermatrix [
]. To that matrix we added 109 characters from other studies, 17 taxa, and made several changes to characters and codings (Methods S1). Codings for Llanocetus denticrenatus were taken from published matrices [
,
]
as well as our own observations of the described mandibular fragment.
The supermatrix was analyzed using unweighted parsimony, with implied
weighting (k = 2 −10), and with molecular data excluded (k = 3) using
the application TNT [
].
A “New Technology” search was conducted using default values, except
searches were terminated after the best tree was found 1000 times. Gaps
in sequence data were read as missing data.
Character Evolution
Two
different optimizations of diastema size were conducted on the tree
derived from our k = 3 analysis. First the variation was divided into 4
equal states and modeled using likelihood with a Mk1 model and equal
branch lengths in Mesquite [
]. Next the variation was mapped as a continuous ordered character in TNT [
].
The fragment ZMT-62 was previously interpreted as including p2-p4, but
here we reinterpret this specimen as including p4-m2. An undescribed
specimen, ChM PV4745, which was included in some previous studies [
,
,
] was not included here because it is clearly a juvenile specimen, and may be conspecific with Coronodon havensteini.
Quantification and Statistical Analysis
Relative Size of Diastema
Diastema length was standardized by the length of p4 (or closest tooth) (see Table S3).
Estimates of Body Size
Body Length
Body length estimates were calculated using the following equation [
], where TL is total body length and BIZYG is maximum width across the zygomatic processes of the skull.
Body Mass
Body mass in kg (BM) was estimated from body length in cm with this equation [
].
Author Contributions
Conceptualization,
J.H.G. and B.L.B.; Formal Analysis, J.H.G.; Investigation, all authors;
Resources, M.B.; Writing, J.H.G., B.L.B., and R.W.B; Funding
Acquisition, J.H.G., B.L.B., and M.B.
Acknowledgments
During
this project we benefitted from discussions with M. Churchill, M.
Mihlbachler, and A. Sanders. We thank S. Boessenecker (Mace Brown Museum
of Natural History), M. Gibson, J. McCormick, and A. Sanders (The
Charleston Museum) for access to specimens. We acknowledge the
Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, for CT
scans of the holotype. Use of the application TNT was provided by the
Willi Hennig Society. This research was supported by the National
Science Foundation (NSF EAR-1349607 to J.H.G. and B.L.B.).
Supplemental Information
-
Document S1. Figures S1–S4 and Tables S1–S3
-
Data S1. Details on Systematics, Morphology, and Paleobiological Interpretations of Coronodon havensteini gen. et sp. nov., Related to Figures 1, 2, and 3
-
Methods S1. Character List Used for Phylogenetic Analysis, Related to Figure 4 and STAR Methods
References
Scaling
of lunge-feeding performance in rorqual whales: mass-specific energy
expenditure increases with body size and progressively limits diving
capacity.
Funct. Ecol. 2012; 26: 216-226
A behavioural framework for the evolution of feeding in predatory aquatic mammals.
Proc. Biol. Sci. 2017; 284: 20162750
Suction feeding preceded filtering in baleen whale evolution.
Mem. Mus. Vic. 2016; 75: 71-82
A
new Early Oligocene toothed ‘baleen’ whale (Mysticeti: Aetiocetidae)
from western North America: one of the oldest and the smallest.
R. Soc. Open Sci. 2015; 210.1098/rsos.150476
Morphological and molecular evidence for a stepwise evolutionary transition from teeth to baleen in mysticete whales.
Syst. Biol. 2008; 57: 15-37
A new cetacean from the Late Eocene La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula.
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1989; 46: 2219-2235
Stratigraphic revision of the Cooper Group and the Chandler Bridge and Edisto Formations in the Coastal Plain of South Carolina.
S. C. Geol. 2016; 49: 1-24
Cranial asymmetry in Eocene archaeocete whales and the evolution of directional hearing in water.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011; 108: 14545-14548
Form, Function, and Anatomy of Dorudon atrox (Mammalia, Cetacea): An Archaeocete from the Middle to Late Eocene of Egypt.
Univ. Michigan Pap. Paleontol. 2004; 34: 1-222
Bite marks revisited – evidence for middle-to-late Eocene Basilosaurus isis predation on Dorudon atrox (both Cetacea, Basilosauridae).
Palaeontol. Electronica. 2012; 15: 32A
Ecological, morphological and genetic divergence of sympatric North Atlantic killer whale populations.
Mol. Ecol. 2009; 18: 5207-5217
Shark predation and tooth wear in a population of northeastern Pacific killer whales.
Aquat. Biol. 2011; 11: 213-224
The structural consequences of skull flattening in crocodilians.
in: Thomason J.J.
(Ed.)
Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge; 1995: 173-192
A bizarre new toothed mysticete (Cetacea) from Australia and the early evolution of baleen whales.
Proc. Biol. Sci. 2006; 273: 2955-2963
Frontomandibular stay of Balaenopteridae: a mechanism from momentum recapture during feeding.
J. Mammal. 1995; 76: 877-899
The morphology and systematics of Mammalodon colliveri (Cetacea: Mysticeti), a toothed mysticete from the Oligocene of Australia. Zool.
J. Linn. Soc.-. Lond. 2010; 158: 367-476
Anatomy,
feeding ecology, and ontogeny of a transitional baleen whale: a new
genus and species of Eomysticetidae (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the
Oligocene of New Zealand.
PeerJ. 2015; 3: e1129
Evolution and zoogeography of cetaceans in Australia.
in: Archer M. , Clayton G.
(Eds.)
Vertebrate Zoogeography and Evolution in Australasia. Hesperian Press,
Perth; 1984: 929-948
Decoupling tooth loss from the evolution of baleen in whales.
Front. Mar. Sci. 2017; 410.3389/fmars.2017.00067
Unique feeding morphology in a new prognathous extinct porpoise from the Pliocene of California.
Curr. Biol. 2014; 24: 774-779
Suction feeding in beaked whales: morphological and observational evidence.
Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles County. 1996; 464: 1-12
Baleen wear reveals intraoral water flow patterns of mysticete filter feeding.
J. Morphol. 2016; 277: 453-471
Models of tongue movement in the walrus (Odobenus rosmarus).
J. Morphol. 1984; 182: 179-196
Leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) use suction and filter feeding when hunting small prey underwater.
Polar Biol. 2013; 36: 211-222
Feeding behaviour of a captive crabeater seal.
Polar Biol. 1990; 10: 403-404
Quantitative
analysis of the influences of phylogeny and ecology on phocid and
otariid pinniped (Mammalia; Carnivora) cranial morphology.
J. Zool. (Lond.). 2010; 280: 297-308
The better to eat you with: the comparative feeding morphology of phocid seals (Pinnipedia, Phocidae).
J. Anat. 2016; 228: 396-413
Functional implications of variation in tooth spacing and crown size in pinnipedimorpha (mammalia: carnivora).
Anat. Rec. (Hoboken). 2015; 298: 878-902
Vascularization
of the gray whale palate (Cetacea, Mysticeti, Eschrichtius robustus):
soft tissue evidence for an alveolar source of blood to baleen.
Anat. Rec. (Hoboken). 2015; 298: 691-702
Skull anatomy of the Oligocene toothed mysticete Aetioceus weltoni (Mammalia; Cetacea): implications for mysticete evolution and functional anatomy.
Zool. J. Linn. Soc.-. Lond. 2008; 154: 308-352
A
new genus and species of eomysticetid (Cetacea: Mysticeti) and a
reinterpretation of ‘Mauicetus’ lophocephalus Marples, 1956:
Transitional baleen whales from the upper Oligocene of New Zealand.
Zool. J. Linn. Soc.-. Lond. 2015; 175: 607-660
Parallel evolutionary trajectories underlie the origin of giant suspension-feeding whales and bony fishes.
Proc. Biol. Sci. 2012; 279: 944-951
Reconstructing
body size in extinct crown Cetacea (Neoceti) using allometry,
phylogenetic methods and tests from the fossil record.
J. Mamm. Evol. 2011; 18: 269-288
The evolutionary history of cetacean brain and body size.
Evolution. 2013; 67: 3339-3353
Mandible
allometry in extant and fossil Balaenopteridae (Cetacea: Mammalia): the
largest vertebrate skeletal element and its role in rorqual lunge
feeding.
Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 2013; 108: 586-599
Body weight and relative brain size (encephalization) in Eocene Archaeoceti (Cetacea).
J. Mamm. Evol. 2016; 23: 17-31
Mandibular and dental variation and the evolution of suction feeding in Odontoceti.
J. Mammal. 2006; 87: 579-588
Comparative anatomy and evolutionary history of suction feeding in cetaceans.
Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2011; 27: 493-513
TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis.
Cladistics. 2008; 24: 774-786
Maddison, W.P., and Maddison, D.R. (2017). Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.2 http://mesquiteproject.org.
Article Info
Publication History
Published: June 29, 2017
Accepted:
May 31,
2017
Received in revised form:
May 21,
2017
Received:
April 25,
2017
IDENTIFICATION
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.003Copyright
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd.
User License
Elsevier user license |ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectFigures
- Figure 1Cranium and Upper Dentition of Coronodon havensteini sp. et gen. nov.
- Figure 2Filter Feeding in Coronodon havensteini and Associated Morphology
- Figure 3Cranium of Coronodon havensteini in Anterior View
- Figure 4Phylogenetic Position of Coronodon havensteini and Evolution of Key Features Associated with Filter Feeding
Related Articles
- Tissue Biomechanics: Whales Have Some NerveShahCurrent BiologyMarch 06, 2017Open Archive
- Gigantism Precedes Filter Feeding in Baleen Whale EvolutionFordyce et al.Current BiologyMay 10, 2018
- The Ecological Rise of Whales Chronicled by the Fossil RecordPyensonCurrent BiologyJune 05, 2017Open Archive
- Evolution: Hearing and Feeding in Fossil WhalesGeislerCurrent BiologyJune 19, 2017Open Archive
- Infrasonic and Ultrasonic Hearing Evolved after the Emergence of Modern WhalesMourlam et al.Current BiologyJune 08, 2017
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Observação: somente um membro deste blog pode postar um comentário.